The industry builds AI / tech systems and puts a human in the loop. We build it the other way around: therapist workflows where the therapist drives as the decision-maker and AI / tech serves in the process, never over it.
Explore the Therapy AlignedTM Clinical Wiki — theories, modalities & frameworks →A knowledge layer clinicians can edit, session workbooks that leave the client holding something real, documentation and planning assistants that give the hour back, and the clinical record to integrate it all. Different jobs — same rule: the clinician drives, the technology works underneath.
A cross-disciplinary, open-source reference for clinicians — theories, modalities and frameworks, each with worked examples of how to carry it into a treatment plan.
Example output from development — Parts Mapper Workbook
In development
AI-powered, therapist-driven tools for structured therapeutic work.
Unlike static worksheets, Adaptive Clinical Workbooks respond to what the clinician and client enter, helping them explore concepts, identify patterns, generate examples, and move through structured therapeutic exercises while keeping the clinician in control of the clinical process. Each one saves its work into the EHR you already run — no rip-and-replace.
Most records are built for the payer and handed to the clinician. The ECN is the inverse: a clinical notebook first — formulation, what happened, what the client took home — that earns its administrative keep on the way out. The ECN is part of the bigger vision.
The administrative side of the same posture. The clinician brings the judgment — what was observed, what it means, what happens next — and the assistant carries the structure, so the note reads like the session actually went.
Goals and objectives that come out of the clinical formulation rather than a dropdown. Drafting support that stays anchored to the theory the clinician is actually working from, with the Clinical Wiki underneath it.
Everything here is being developed toward HIPAA and 42 CFR Part 2 compliance.
Regarding AI…
“We believe in creating AI-in-the-loop products. This flips the common human-in-the-loop for AI systems. In our vision, we are working on products that are human / therapist systems with AI in the loop.”
Andrew H. Kim, MSW, LCSW, LCADC — Chief Architect
Human-in-the-loop means the machine runs the process and a person checks its work. It is a safety valve bolted onto an automated system. It is also, in behavioral health, exactly backwards.
The therapeutic relationship is not a process waiting to be automated with a reviewer attached. It is the intervention. So we build the architecture the opposite way: the therapist is the system, the alliance is the operating logic, and AI is a component that runs inside it — drafting a frame, holding a thread, rendering something the client can look at — always under clinical judgment, never in front of it.
Practically, that changes what we ship. Therapist workflows with AI assisting and supporting therapist functions. No model deciding what matters. Every tool has a therapist’s hand on it and ends with something two people made together.
Our Chief Architect is developing the 5-Level AI-Integrated Psychotherapy Framework, set out in a public Open Science Framework project that maps how AI can enter a live psychotherapy session without compromising the alliance — positioning AI as a “third chair” in the room rather than a replacement for the two people already in it. Every level of that framework describes a way AI can sit inside the loop. None of them hand AI the loop.
Clinical Wiki live and open to community revision, with semantic search, notebooks and a public library.
Both halves of the work — clinical workflows for the room (Parts Mapper Workbook, Storyboarding Workbook, Window of Tolerance Workbook, Coping Menu Workbook) and administrative workflows around it (the SOAP Note Assistant, the Treatment Plan Assistant). Each one is being built to sit on top of the EHR a practice already runs and save its work into that record, with zero data retention (ZDR) on our side.
Modality-specific tools designed alongside the clinicians who bring the theory — one framework at a time, built to the same posture as the rest of the suite.
A clinical-first EHR with the tools and assistants already embedded. As part of the bigger vision, this moves EHRs from compliance-driven entries (progress notes, treatment plans, contact notes) to a clinically-driven notebook (parts map, genograms, narrative stories, coping menu). Built on HIPAA and 42 CFR Part 2 compliance architecture to protect your clients.
Stages reflect where work sits today — not a delivery commitment.
Meet the team holding up the thesis


If you have a modality you teach, a framework you keep redrawing on paper, or a moment in session you wish you could hand the client — that is the conversation we want. Pilot access and custom-tool collaboration run through the same form.